Twitter’s been on a rampage of drawing clear battle lines. They’ve been deleting verified check-marks and entire accounts of people who can be considered right-wing, while allowing every single liberal and SJW, like Emily Lindin, free reign on the platform to curse, insult and form hate mobs against people with whom they disagree.
This is no conspiracy theory; this is out in the open, broad daylight, and can be tracked. And it’s the reason that people like Emily Lindin say stupid sh*t on the platform. They know there are no consequences for doing so.
The Story of the Insane Emily Lindin
This is a story in three parts.
Part one: It all starts when Emily Lindin leaves a provocative tweet, in which she’s virtue signaling to people a variation of “listen and believe” and damn the torpedoes because men’s lives being ruined over false allegations is something she seems to find hilarious. Lying women? Protect them. Innocent male victims? Burn them!
She calls it an unpopular opinion, and speaking of people in totality, just like the nonsense wage gap numbers are calculated, she’s correct. Though speaking for her bubble, and the people who like and retweet this, it’s not only a popular opinion but the exact right way to look at it. Men are horrible! She’s a feminist, a sex-positive feminist! This means she’s against slut-shaming and fatherhood and masculinity in any form and believes women need to dominate. She’s not just a modern feminist; she’s a radical feminist.
Part two: Oops! Another verified liberal, Geoffrey Miller, sees this tweet and takes umbrage. Why? Because he’s an SJW too and they need to have the battle of the virtue signal. You see, Geoff believes that false allegations disproportionately affect black men, and he needs to be a good ally by reminding Emily Lindin that black men suffer. Oh, sh*t! Blacks are the original victims in America! If you’re a feminist, even a radical feminist, intersectional black feminists will rip you a new asshole for not putting black people first.
Part three: So, we naturally get Emily Lindin back-tracking and amending, saying the right buzz words by stating it was an oversight on her part. When she said “men,” what she really meant was “white supremacy,” and that all of these white people, even if being falsely accused, deserve it. But not you, black man – please don’t kill me!
Emily Lindin is a lunatic. Let’s have a closer look at her, at the type of person Twitter would promote to untouchable verified status while a guy like me gets booted off because he pointed out to feminists that they can’t make demands of black people (which Emily Lindin just ironically backed up by instantly apologizing to black males while making sure to throw “white supremacy” at all white men).
We can see what sort of person, what sort of insane sex-posi feminist, is Emily Lindin. Her big project is “UnSlut,” a documentary film which is seeking to do away with the label of slut being attributed to promiscuous girls. Because, you know, just like women having over 50,000,000 abortions every single year, their choices aren’t hurting anyone, right!? Women are free to do whatever the f*ck they want to do, and you’re the bad one for judging them.
Never mind epidemic rates of single mothers, who objectively raise worse children on the whole. Never mind rampant rates of STDs women are spreading around the nation. Never mind initiating 70% of divorces and ruining men’s lives when they dare try to build a family with them. Women can do whatever the hell they want in society, and we oppress them by judging them.
We should shame women’s bad choices, just as we shame men’s bad choices! Why do you get a free pass just because you slap on “woman” as a shield?
I’ll obviously be called a misogynist and sexist for expecting women to be held to the same standards as men because we all know they want their cake, they want to eat it too, they want you to pay for it, and they want you to stick around and do the dishes while they go eat cake at another person’s house right after. This is modern feminism – women do whatever they want, take whatever the want, and you’re oppressing them if you point out how reckless and selfish and harmful they are. No.
We need to shame them!
You don’t call a poor kid a “prep” or a rich kid “white trash.” You don’t call good girls sluts. Nobody does that. Girls who protect their virtue aren’t smeared as sluts. And girls who sleep around with no thought to anything but their own hedonistic pursuits are—wait for it—sluts!
There’s something to be said about shame. Brilliant men like Jordan Peterson often argue that the structures created by religion have, so to speak, artificially boxed in our truer nature as animals and have kept us creating the facades of rational actors rather than devil-may-care ape-beasts. I think he’s on the right track but is focusing on a single tree and missing the forest. It’s not the religion itself; rather it’s the consequences of not being an adherent of that religion.
A lot of people are dumb. Emily Lindin seems to be an incredibly naive individual of low character and even lower intelligence, no doubt earning some high-interest-rate “studies” degree at a mid-level university. Though people are still smarter than for what we give them credit. It seems fairly obvious to me that people, after the first generation of no gods descending from the heavens to punish them, figured out that the punishments they’d suffer from not toeing the religious line would ultimately be from their fellow man, the strict adherents of the religion.
For many things in life, shame was brutal. Nonbelievers, homosexuals, and on it goes – these people were ostracized and sometimes worse. Though for many, many things in society, people fearing their peers shaming them kept things in line. Kept things controllable. Kept things normalized. Kept society neater than otherwise.
People like Emily Lindin, despite championing nonbinary gender nonsense, have very binary thought patterns when it comes to historical things. This good; that bad. Because the past included slavery and women’s oppression and other cruel tidbits, therefore the past is wholly bad and the future—the progressive way—is subsequently wholly good; holy good, even. This is weak-willed perception, however.
Shaming promiscuous women was a fantastic tool for families and society. Sorry, Emily, but nature dictated that women have wombs and bring forth children, and children need caring for lest they’ll die off or, even more damaging to society, they’ll grow up to became criminals and overall bad people, harming others and society overall.
By shaming sluts, we create a culture that opposes women flippantly sleeping around and getting knocked up and living as single mothers. We all know progressive feminists champion single motherhood. Though just like your white-guilt genuflecting nonsense when you were told false allegations hurt black males, do you care that single motherhood is tearing the black community apart more so than white supremacy has ever done?
No. Of course you don’t. You’re a low-IQ buffoon who believes that blacks are failing because of white people, not that their single mothers are horrible at the job of being single mothers. No. You could never believe that; you cannot allow yourself to believe that because it would be too uncomfortable. Instead, you believe women are empowered and don’t need no stinkin’ man to raise a good child! You believe women should be free to do whatever the hell they want, and that calling a girl a slut and hurting her feelings is somehow worse than the girl actually being a slut and ruining lives and society to satiate her selfish desires.
Emily Lindin believes in the SJW equivalent of paying your Catholic sin tax by incessantly virtue signaling, and doubling down when it backfires.
I won’t call you a slut. I have no idea about your sex life, nor do I want to know. But if you are promiscuous and sleeping around, I would call you a slut. And I’d hope everyone with sense pointed and laughed and draped a scarlet letter across you. Why? Because having your feelings hurt is a hell of a lot better than you having a litter of kids without daddies and pushing mentally deficient criminals out into the world.
Emily Lindin is the poster child for the sort of ideology Twitter wants to promote: Instant gratification hedonism with no thought for anyone but yourself. She can virtue signal about being for black people, claiming they’re oppressed and she does care, but we know for a fact—we all know for a fact—that’s just bullsh*t virtue signaling so that she doesn’t get called out (shamed!) by her own side for being a racist. She wants to do whatever she wants while avoiding the scarlet letter. Sorry, chick, but life doesn’t work like that for anyone. You get judged in this world.
Hey, Emily Lindin, here’s an idea for your follow-up docu: UnRacist – Doing Away With White-Shaming So Ignorant Gender-Studies Majors Won’t Have To Pretend To Care In Public About Blacks.
I’d buy that for a dollar.